About QuestionConnection

QuestionConnection is a free deck of conversation prompts and a small library of articles for couples. It exists because my wife and I needed it, and we figured other couples probably did too.

Who's behind it

I'm D.J. Westbrooks. I'm in my 50s and I've been married for over 28 years. Like a lot of long-married couples, we hit a stretch where the easy conversation had been used up. We had kids, work, logistics, the mortgage, the same joke we've told for fifteen years. The relationship was fine. It just wasn't getting anywhere new.

So I started looking for ways to improve things, not because anything was broken, but because "fine" wasn't what I signed up for. I tried the printed card decks you can buy. We did a few. They were fine too. Mostly the same prompts, mostly the same answers. I wanted something that would actually open a conversation we hadn't already had.

I started building a digital version with the questions I wanted to ask. That became the first version of QuestionConnection. The articles came later, once I realized I'd been reading more relationship research than most of my friends had, and it seemed wasteful not to write it down.

What this site is, and what it isn't

QuestionConnection is a deck of conversation prompts for couples, plus a small library of articles about relationships. Both are drawn from the work of researchers and therapists who have spent their careers studying what helps couples stay close.

None of it is therapy. It is not a credentialed assessment of your relationship. It is not medical, psychological, or clinical advice, and it is not a substitute for any of those things. I'm not a licensed marriage counselor, not a psychologist, and not a researcher. I am a person who has spent years reading what actual researchers and therapists have published (Gottman, Johnson, Nagoski, Tatkin, Hendrix, Perel, Real), and trying to translate the useful parts into something that works on a Tuesday night after the kids are in bed.

How the questions and articles are sourced

I wrote or rewrote every question in the deck, drawing most of them from prompts that showed up in the research literature on couples communication. The four categories (Light, Fun, Deep, and Intimacy) exist because most couples don't need a heavy question on a random weeknight. They need something that fits the room.

The articles work the same way. I read what an actual expert wrote on a topic, then write up what was useful from it in language a normal couple can use at the dinner table. The articles name who the research came from (Gottman's Four Horsemen, Sue Johnson's A.R.E. framework, Nagoski's brake and accelerator model, and so on), so you can go read the original if you want the depth.

When I write about something that probably needs a professional (infidelity, abuse, addiction, serious mental health concerns), I link out to actual clinical resources. The site is not equipped to handle those situations and I don't pretend otherwise.

An honest disclaimer

I want to be straight with you: if your relationship is in real trouble (if someone is unsafe, if there is abuse, if one of you is in crisis), please talk to a licensed professional. The questions on this site can help couples who are mostly fine stay connected, and they can help couples who are stuck get unstuck. They cannot fix something that needs clinical intervention. A deck of cards is not equipped for that, and neither am I.

If you need help finding a therapist, the resources page has a few places to start.

Why it's free

The deck and articles are free to use. There are no paywalls, no accounts, no upsells to "unlock" the better questions. The site makes a small amount through affiliate links to books I genuinely recommend and to an online therapy service I link to from a few articles. If you click those and buy something, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. That's it. That's the whole business model.

I made it free because I wanted to use it myself, and because I think a lot of couples would benefit from a small nudge to actually talk to each other on purpose sometimes. Charging for that nudge felt wrong.

Get in touch

If you have a question, a correction, or a suggestion, I'd genuinely like to hear it. The best way to reach me is by email.